Senate approves U.S. budget bill, ends yet another shutdown threat
WASHINGTON - Washington's battles over government funding ended with a whimper on Thursday as the U.S. Senate approved a $1.1 trillion spending bill that quells for nearly nine months the threat of another federal agency shutdown.
The measure, which funds thousands of government programs from the military to national parks through the Sept. 30 fiscal year-end, passed on a strong, 72-26 bipartisan vote. President Barack Obama is expected to sign it into law by Saturday.
Both New Hampshire senators, Republican Kelly Ayotte and Democrat Jeanne Shaheen, voted for passage (Full roll call vote can be found by clicking here.)
The vote came exactly three months after the end of a 16-day government shutdown in October that was waged over disputed funding of "Obamacare," the president's signature health care law.
"We're a little late, but we have gotten the job done," Senate Appropriations Committee Barbara Mikulski said on the Senate floor.
The fiscal focus in Congress now turns to debate over another boost in the $17 trillion federal debt limit. An increase could be needed in as little as six weeks.
Republicans have not said what they will demand in return for lifting the borrowing cap, but House Speaker John Boehner signaled to reporters on Thursday that he has little desire for a massive fight that threatens a damaging U.S. debt default.
The United States "shouldn't even get close to it," he told reporters, calling for quick action on a bill to increase the limit.
Devil in details
The Senate accelerated its normal debate procedures to vote on the spending bill more quickly, avoiding a delayed start to a week-long holiday recess - even though most lawmakers had not read much of the 1,582-page measure.
The massive spending bill was only introduced on Monday evening, and it includes some controversial provisions that are only just now coming to light.
A taxpayer advocacy group, Taxpayers for Common Sense, described as "outrageous" a provision that would continue uranium enrichment research by USEC Inc for some $62 million this year, despite the company's announcement in December that it would file a pre-packaged bankruptcy reorganization plan.
Boehner defended the provision for the company, which was privatized in 1992 from former Department of Energy assets, including a facility in his home state of Ohio.
"There's all different types of bankruptcy proceedings. It is a uranium enrichment facility with new technology. There's been a bipartisan effort to proceed with this research that they're doing," Boehner said.
The swift consideration of the measure reflects a desire by members of both parties in both the House and Senate to put the fiscal battles behind them and ensure government funding during an election year.
The measure eases some of the automatic, "sequester" spending cuts by providing an additional $45 billion in funding, split evenly between military and domestic programs.
But Republican Senator Ted Cruz, who launched an effort to gut funding for Obama's signature healthcare law, remained defiant, saying that Democrats were allowing Americans to suffer from negative effects of the health insurance reforms.
Cruz, whose push to remove funding for the health law fueled the government shutdown, tried again to stop funding for the law but his amendment was blocked by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat.
"The Majority leader and Senate Democrats are not listening to the American people," Cruz said. "Instead they have chosen a course of conduct, doing nothing, that is not responsible."
To improve the chance of seeing your comment posted here or published in the New Hampshire Union Leader:
- Identify yourself. Accounts using fake or incomplete names are suspended regardless of the quality of posts.
- Say something new, stay on topic, keep it short.
- Links to outside URLs are discouraged, if used they should be on topic.
- Avoid comments in bad taste, write well, avoid using all capital letters
- Don't cite facts about individuals or businesses without providing a means to verify the claim
- If you see an objectionable comment please click the "Report Abuse" button and be sure to tell us why.
Note: Comments are the opinion of the respective poster and not of the publisher.
Rck Walters said:
Ted Cruz is confusing "the people" with Ted Cruz
January 17, 2014 7:28 am
eric boyle said:
Keep at it Ted!
January 17, 2014 8:18 am
George LeMont said:
We may as well give teenagers or Home Shopping Network addicts a government credit card and set them loose. One more year of outrageous government spending and one more year of ignoring tens or hundreds of billions of dollars in waste, fraud and corruption. But the free stuff crowd will be happy along with every con artist under the sun. Last year the IRS gave away hundreds of millions of dollars in fraud to people who didn't deserve a return, and the rest of us paid for it with our taxes. Lets see how much they loose for us this year now, then come looking for more for the children's sake or for women's causes. When it comes to squandering our money they know exactly how to tug at your heart strings while ignoring their own incompetence.
January 17, 2014 10:21 am
John Mercier said:
George LeMont... Taxpayers for Common Sense says they are 'tugging at your heart strings' for a uranium enrichment facility.
January 17, 2014 12:30 pm
George LeMont said:
John Mercier both sides siphon money to those who paid handsomely for their elections. Where the average American fits into that spending is still a mystery. I'm looking forward to my reward for decades of paying taxes and not taking a penny. Working until I'm dead and getting less social security should be a blast, and it's my obligation to those who are third and fourth generation non workers. Obama phones don't fall off trees after all and someone has to pay for them.
January 18, 2014 3:50 am
John Mercier said:
George LeMont... The money would just be spent elsewhere in the appropriation. Less SS is a function of the trust fund, it was set out during the Reagan reforms of the 80s - with the understanding that Americans would need to take more responsibility for their retirement incomes in the future.
January 18, 2014 9:42 am
Post a comment
© Union Leader Corp.