Windham officials balk at water proposal
Following a lengthy discussion at Monday night's meeting, the Windham Board of Selectmen voted against placing the warrant article on the ballot, with two of the four board members present voting "nay" on the matter.
Hohenberger said he couldn't support such an expense. "I'm against it for the simple fact that you're asking the entire town to pick up the price of something that will only benefit a small portion," he told Valentine.
"As I try to weigh all the benefits, I just don't think municipal water is absolutely necessary to extend development," Difruscia said.
A January 2012 municipal study on the cost of public services indicated that new commercial development would result in a net gain of 78 cents for every tax dollar collected in Windham, while the town's master plan calls for an increase in the commercial tax base to 10 percent of total valuation by 2014.
He declined to identify where, exactly, that neighborhood is located as several owners asked him not to, citing concerns about diminishing property values.
Board Chairman Phil Lochiatto voted in favor of the putting the water study before voters.
"I'd say the number one deterrent of economic development in our town is the (lack of municipal water)," he said. "That's a huge deterrent."
Valentine now has until Jan. 14 to submit a citizen's petition on the water study should he decide to do so.
The Salem Observer
100 William Loeb Drive
Manchester, NH 03109
Neighborhood News publications can be found at a newsstand near you here.
News, Obituaries, & Social Announcements
Christine Heiser, Executive Editor
Email ads to email@example.com
Classified advertising: 603-669-1010
Display advertising: 603-206-7800 x264
Rate card | Ad Order | Credit application
Please use our online form at www.nh365.org
Enter to win tickets to see Paula Poundstone
Win tickets to see Steven Wright
Goffstown's Bourque impresses; Memorial, Bishop Guertin, Pinkerton win in Queen City Jamboree
13 undocumented children in NH