All Sections
Welcome guest, you have 2 views left. | Register | Sign In

Cops & crime: Manchester's election-year problem

Crime in Manchester (as in most cities) spikes every summer. It’s as predictable as kids lining up at Cremeland, bikers returning to Laconia, and guys showing off their tattoos at Hampton Beach. Just as predictable: in a municipal election year, someone will present the recurrence of this annual pattern as a sudden and unexpected rise in crime that requires an immediate remedy.

Positioning themselves for next month’s election, aldermen on Tuesday unanimously passed a resolution stating that “city officials should be pursuing every opportunity to hire additional police officers, including applying for grants and funding through COPS or other applicable government programs.”

And here we go. The question, as always, is not whether Manchester could benefit from more officers on the beat. It could. The question is whether the city can fund those positions. It cannot. Applying for federal grants is no solution. As a condition of receiving the short-term grants, the city typically must promise to continue funding the positions for a specified period of time after the grants end. Such terms put the city in the position of having to raise taxes.

Tuesday’s resolution was proposed by Aldermen Dan O’Neil and Patrick Arnold, naturally. O’Neil never misses an opportunity to swell city union ranks, regardless of the cost, and Arnold is a candidate for mayor desperately in search of a message. Amazingly, he has settled on crime. He pretends that this summer’s seasonal spike represents an “epidemic” of violence. Or worse, he is an alderman who doesn’t know that crime swells in the summer and drops in the fall.


To improve the chance of seeing your comment posted here or published in the New Hampshire Union Leader:

  • Identify yourself. Accounts using fake or incomplete names are suspended regardless of the quality of posts.
  • Say something new, stay on topic, keep it short.
  • Links to outside URLs are discouraged, if used they should be on topic.
  • Avoid comments in bad taste, write well, avoid using all capital letters
  • Don't cite facts about individuals or businesses without providing a means to verify the claim
  • If you see an objectionable comment please click the "Report Abuse" button and be sure to tell us why.

Note: Comments are the opinion of the respective poster and not of the publisher.

Be the first to comment.

Post a comment

You must sign in before you can post comments. If you are experiencing issues with your account please e-mail

More Editorials

Income tax debate: It is a great one to have

   20   Editorials PUBLISHED - 7:43 pm 10/04  

Getting real: NH should tell feds to buzz off

   9   Editorials PUBLISHED - 5:48 pm 10/03  

Hassan's budget? Stealing credit again

   15   Editorials PUBLISHED - 11:11 pm 10/01  

Dumping NH: Be careful what you wish for

   7   Editorials PUBLISHED - 10:22 pm 9/30  

Unethical aldermen: Will the people respond?

   14   Editorials PUBLISHED - 11:32 pm 9/29  

Falling behind: Taxes and the world

   28   Editorials PUBLISHED - 11:33 pm 9/29  

'Culture of protection': Unaccountable bureaucracies

   11   Editorials PUBLISHED - 5:46 pm 9/28  

Overdose honesty: NH will need more of it

   1   Editorials PUBLISHED - 11:41 pm 9/27  

NH Angle - Editorials