All Sections
Welcome guest, you have 2 views left. | Register | Sign In

Taxes and sausage: A problem in Nashua

Building sidewalks is hard, draining work. Crews get hungry. In Nashua, they have satisfied this hunger by charging restaurant meals to the taxpayers. How nice.

Nashua is renovating the sidewalks on a portion of Main Street downtown. This summer, the crews doing that work sometimes popped into The Sausage King, bought lunch, and billed the public. The taxpayers bought nearly $1,500 worth of Sausage King meals for these city employees, with all of the expenses approved by another city employee.

Mayor Donalee Lozeau said this week that the employee who approved the lunch purchases has left the city’s employ, but was not fired. The city is reviewing other approved expenditures and the approval procedures. The former employee faces no discipline or punishment because apparently no law or policy was broken. And therein lies the real story.

Why does Nashua have an expense-approval system in which taxpayers could shell out so much money to fill the bellies of city workers with sausages? Buying meals for employees who are not traveling out of town on city business is a questionable practice. Having lax rules to govern those purchases is beyond questionable; it is unacceptable.

In context of the entire city budget, $1,500 might not seem like much money. But it represents a large chunk of someone’s property tax bill. Municipalities (all governments, in fact) have a duty to see that no taxpayer money is wasted. That is hard to do without good rules governing the expenditure of all city funds.


To improve the chance of seeing your comment posted here or published in the New Hampshire Union Leader:

  • Identify yourself. Accounts using fake or incomplete names are suspended regardless of the quality of posts.
  • Say something new, stay on topic, keep it short.
  • Links to outside URLs are discouraged, if used they should be on topic.
  • Avoid comments in bad taste, write well, avoid using all capital letters
  • Don't cite facts about individuals or businesses without providing a means to verify the claim
  • If you see an objectionable comment please click the "Report Abuse" button and be sure to tell us why.

Note: Comments are the opinion of the respective poster and not of the publisher.

Be the first to comment.

Post a comment

You must sign in before you can post comments. If you are experiencing issues with your account please e-mail

More Editorials

A tax cut deal: How both sides can win

   0   Editorials PUBLISHED - 10:35 pm 9/15  

Obama's bad lunches: Londonderry dines alone

   0   Editorials PUBLISHED - 10:35 pm 9/15  

The city budget: There will be math

   3   Editorials PUBLISHED - 11:15 pm 9/14  

Voting in NH: Still open to non-residents

   19   Editorials PUBLISHED - 11:15 pm 9/14  

Fish & Game's base: Legislators must broaden it

   16   Editorials PUBLISHED - 5:35 pm 9/13  

Manchester's election: No time for complacency

   7   Editorials PUBLISHED - 6:21 pm 9/12  

To the West: The world's great hope

   1   Editorials PUBLISHED - 6:21 pm 9/12  

Forgetting: There are serious consequences

   16   Editorials PUBLISHED - 7:47 pm 9/10  

Elizabeth's 'reign': A costly fiction

   12   Editorials PUBLISHED - 7:47 pm 9/10  

NH Angle - Editorials