Jul 24, 2014
Jul 16, 2014
Jul 10, 2014
Jun 26, 2014
New Durham woman convicted of starving child given 10-30 year prison sentence Monday
Thomas, 34, of 214 Birch Hill Road in New Durham, has been held in jail since a jury found her guilty in February of "deliberate" first-degree assault for withholding food from a boy, who is developmentally delayed - between 2006 and 2010.
The boy, who is now 9, is being cared for by foster parents who said he has shown dramatic improvement, but will always be affected by the experience.
Assistant County Attorney Alysia Cassotis said the state recommended the maximum sentence, which included the conditions she have no contact with the boy or his family, as Thomas deliberately targeted the boy.
"This is starving a child over a series of years," Cassotis said, adding when the boy was 6½ and weighed as much as a 10-month old.
"It is time she's held responsible for what she's done with this child," Cassotis said, adding Thomas must be punished and rehabilitated.
As a jury already convicted Thomas, Lewis said the sentencing hearing was not the time or the place to re-try the case. He was looking only at whether Thomas could offer any mitigating factors in the case.
"I'm asking hard questions, but this is the time to have a discussion with me," Lewis said.
Attorney Steven Keable - who represented Thomas - argued there were factors as she was subjected to physical and emotional abuse as a child, was institutionalized as a teen, became a mother at 15, used drugs and alcohol. He added this long history of issues created a personality disorder that should be taken under consideration.
Keable read a letter Thomas wrote for the hearing, which asked the court to be lenient.
"I have remorse for some things I have done," Keable read, adding Thomas maintains her innocence.
Keable argued a sentence of 2½ to 10 years would be sufficiently stringent, but give her an opportunity to stay connected to her six biological children.
"My children are my life," Keable read.
Lewis said he felt the sentence in the case must be harsh enough to punish Thomas while deterring others. He added it also provides a controlled environment to allow Thomas to seek rehabilitation.
"You need structure," Lewis said, citing her history of resisting authority and manipulating others.
Lewis encouraged Thomas to take advantage of the opportunities, take responsibility and stay in touch with her children.
"It's not the end of the world if you're 44 when you get out," Lewis said, adding she can still have a relationship with her children while in prison.
Lewis said the pre-sentencing investigation stresses that Thomas, who underwent two psychiatric evaluations as part of the trial, must find motivation to improve.
"It's entirely up to you," Lewis said.
Following the sentencing, Thomas entered a not-guilty plea to two new charges - falsifying physical evidence and perjury - in connection with her three-week trial that ended Feb. 21.
Falsifying physical evidence and perjury are a Class B Felonies, which could each result in 3½ to 7 years in jail and a $2,000 fine, if convicted.
READER COMMENTS: 0
- More details released in Nashua officer-involved shooting - 0
- Family charged in alleged Canobie Lake Park melee released on bail - 0
- Keene man arraigned in chalking assault - 0
- Man sentenced for driving into Ashuelot Post Office - 0
- Exeter police continue search for man who robbed bakery - 0
- Manchester Crimewatch: City woman warned by judge to show up for trial next month - 0
- Manchester police probe shooting on Lowell Street - 0
- Alleged Hernandez kidnapper well-known to Gorham police - 0
- Plaistow lawyer found not guilty on all charges in sex assault case - 0
READER COMMENTS: 0
- NH Shrine team girds for Vt.'s ground attack - 0
- On Baseball: Fishers prospects sweat out deadline day - 0
- Goffstown ready for LL regional tourney - 0
- Dave D'Onofrio's Sox Beat -- Message is clear: Offense needs boost - 0
- Marina dealers say boat sales are on the rise - 0
- Another View -- Gilles Bissonnette: Why voting in NH is not reserved for state residents - 0
- John Stossel: Healthy profits? - 0
- Clinton vs. speech: Bullying first; what next? - 0
- Another View - Charles Lane: Your money is being spent by dead people - 0
Havenstein says he has always opposed Obamacare, though company he led was paid to implement parts of it
George Will: A conservative internationalism
Heroes all? A word cheapened by overuse
Mark Hayward's City Matters: Market Basket workers' outlook challenges the skeptics among us
Market Basket customers mobilize
Punch line: The NFL blows it
Police held Abby suspect's guns
- Mass. Supreme Judicial Court has found upskirt photos taken on a subway aren't illegal. Should such voyeurism be a crime?
- Total Votes: 917