Home » Opinion » Editorials
Carbon fantasy: Don't hike the RGGI tax
RGGI is a pact in which the New England states and three others agree to limit carbon emissions by law. The states then sell to power producers credits that allow those producers to emit specific amounts of carbon. Producers thereby pay for their emissions, giving them an incentive for reduction.
The current RGGI emissions cap is 165 million tons a year. The RGGI states are producing nowhere near that much carbon - not because of RGGI, but because of the marketplace. Cleaner-burning natural gas is cheaper than coal, and a big movement to gas in the past several years has reduced emissions. So has the economy. Less economic activity means less demand for power.
All of this means that the states don't have the RGGI windfall they desired.
Those emissions credits meant big bucks for states, which would then spend the money on energy efficiency projects. With little demand for the credits, the price for them has fallen, and states are out millions. But politicians always have plans for obtaining the cash they want to spend.
The RGGI states want to lower the carbon emissions standards from 165 million tons a year to 91 million. Why? To raise the price of the credits.
This will further increase electric utility rates, which RGGI boosters acknowledge. But it won't have any noticeable impact on the climate. India, China and other growing economies are belching out so much carbon that any reduction caused by RGGI limits will be overwhelmed. We will pay higher rates not to cool the planet, which this change will not cause, but to give the states bigger "energy conservation" slush funds.
The state Senate's Energy and Natural Resources Committee has approved the bill to authorize this RGGI change. It already has passed the House. The Senate is the only hope for avoiding this rate-hiking scheme. Senators should do their jobs and protect New Hampshire residents from this needless tax increase.
READER COMMENTS: 2
- Politics of choice: A word stripped of its meaning - 10
- Cataldo for Senate: A keeper for District 6 - 0
- What rising tide? Kuster vs. Kennedy - 20
- On Obamacare: Shaheen doesn't get it - 49
- No news is bad news: Hassan goes to CDC school - 9
- No right to know: Our silent superintendent - 1
- Boutin for Senate: Constituent service for District 16 - 5
- Sanborn for Senate: The obvious choice in District 9 - 2
- Secret arrests: Names contradict ICE narrative - 4
READER COMMENTS: 0
- Keene police release riot images, seek help with identification - 0
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center in Lebanon to care for any potential NH Ebola patients, state announces - 0
- Salem mall renovations on target - 0
- Another View -- John H. Sununu: Voters, pick a governor who is serious about the Pledge - 3
- Team Obama: Faking right, voting left - 12
- Charles Arlinghaus: This government 'investment' is a bad idea - 2
- Manchester mayor asks aldermen to hold abandonded property owners accountable - 0
- Residents given Londonderry playing field priority - 0
- NH has 1,300 guardrail ends targeted in federal safety suit - 1
Locked in a dead heat, Shaheen, Brown spar
NH's back-road rest areas fading away
Team Obama: Faking right, voting left
Keene riots a focus of gubernatorial debate
Preventing riots: What should Keene do?
Health costs up for Manchester
Fixing Obamacare: Shaheen offers no way out