All Sections
Welcome guest, you have 2 views left. | Register | Sign In

Caution first: Nashua needs no rail study yet

Nashua aldermen would waste taxpayer money if they spent any of it studying commuter rail before the state finishes its own $3.6 million study.

Alderman Daniel Moriarty is pushing for a city rail study. On Monday he chastized skeptical aldermen, calling them illogical and saying they want to "remain ignorant and remain uninformed" about rail in Nashua. No, they want to be responsible.

The state is undertaking its own rail study, ostensibly to determine whether commuter rail is even feasible in New Hampshire. (It is not, as other studies show, and we suspect that this study will be designed to reach the opposite conclusion.) Supposing that New Hampshire's study is objective, there is no reason whatsoever for Nashua to undertake its own study now. If New Hampshire's research concludes that commuter rail will not work here, then the dream is dead. Why would Nashua spend a dime to prepare for a rail line whose existence is dependent on a study not yet begun?

Aldermanic President Brian McCarthy and other aldermen are right to wait and see what the state study concludes. That is not ignorance; it is prudence.


To improve the chance of seeing your comment posted here or published in the New Hampshire Union Leader:

  • Identify yourself. Accounts using fake or incomplete names are suspended regardless of the quality of posts.
  • Say something new, stay on topic, keep it short.
  • Links to outside URLs are discouraged, if used they should be on topic.
  • Avoid comments in bad taste, write well, avoid using all capital letters
  • Don't cite facts about individuals or businesses without providing a means to verify the claim
  • If you see an objectionable comment please click the "Report Abuse" button and be sure to tell us why.

Note: Comments are the opinion of the respective poster and not of the publisher.

Be the first to comment.

Post a comment

You must sign in before you can post comments. If you are experiencing issues with your account please e-mail

More Editorials

Upside of SuperPACs: Giving candidates time to move

   0   Editorials PUBLISHED - 8:35 pm 8/18  

The future of dams: A study will be good to watch

   11   Editorials PUBLISHED - 9:57 pm 8/17  

What is in a name? Democrats dumping Jefferson

   13   Editorials PUBLISHED - 9:57 pm 8/17  

Under the boardwalk: A coverup we'd like to keep

   7   Editorials PUBLISHED - 8:24 pm 8/16  

The two-party two-step: Laurel and Hardy writ large

   14   Editorials PUBLISHED - 5:28 pm 8/15  

Trumping the Bern: Is the establishment listening?

   7   Editorials PUBLISHED - 5:28 pm 8/15  

Seized server: Clinton’s in a fine mess

   54   Editorials PUBLISHED - 5:50 pm 8/13  

To the Macks: A Londonderry institution lives

   0   Editorials PUBLISHED - 5:50 pm 8/13  

‘Disturbing’ videos? A talking point forgotten

   32   Editorials PUBLISHED - 9:20 pm 8/12  

NH Angle - Editorials