Wakefield selectmen defend sobriety checkpoints funded by federal debt

Resident Steve Brown said he thought the sobriety checkpoints violate the Fourth Amendment (prohibiting unreasonable searches and seizures) and also questioned the value of a checkpoint since people are told in advance about it. In his opinion using roving patrols was a better use of the money. "Besides, it's federal money, and the fed doesn't have any."


To improve the chance of seeing your comment posted here or published in the New Hampshire Union Leader:

  • Identify yourself. Accounts using fake or incomplete names are suspended regardless of the quality of posts.
  • Say something new, stay on topic, keep it short.
  • Links to outside URLs are discouraged, if used they should be on topic.
  • Avoid comments in bad taste, write well, avoid using all capital letters
  • Don't cite facts about individuals or businesses without providing a means to verify the claim
  • If you see an objectionable comment please click the "Report Abuse" button and be sure to tell us why.

Note: Comments are the opinion of the respective poster and not of the publisher.

Be the first to comment.

Post a comment

You must sign in before you can post comments. If you are experiencing issues with your account please e-mail abuse@unionleader.com.