Home » Opinion » Editorials
Crossing fingers: It is no match for budgeting cautiously
Last week the state received an additional ?$15 million of tobacco settlement money. Based on current figures, that windfall wipes out the current-year deficit caused by hospitals withholding Medicaid Enhancement Tax payments. Earlier this year, the state projected ending the year with a deficit of $41 million. The New Hampshire Democratic Party blamed irresponsible budgeting by the previous Republican Legislature. But a funny thing happened on the way to that deficit.
State tax revenues started exceeding projections this spring. In March, business, insurance, interest and dividends and even tobacco tax revenue were all above projections, bringing in an extra $26.5 million. Suddenly the projected deficit was only $14.5 million. Then came the $15 million in tobacco settlement money.
The fiscal year is not over yet, but with only three months to go things look pretty good. The same cannot be said for Gov. Hassan's budget for next year.
To clarify her break from the budgeting practices of the last Legislature, Hassan pledged to "restore" a host of cuts. The revenue just was not there, but she proceeded with some of the restoration anyway. She attempted to pay for it by convincing the Legislature to authorize expanded gambling - and the $80 million in casino licensing fees that would come with it - but the more cautious House refused to go along.
The House, which sensibly authorized much less in spending than Hassan wanted, nonetheless counted on phantom money. Instead of the casino licensing fees, the House included the extra tobacco settlement money in its budget. That money now goes to this year's budget, blowing a relatively small hole in the House's spending plan for next year.
So here we are, a few months away from the start of the next fiscal year, and all eyes are turning to the Senate, which has to come up with a budget that, unlike the governor's or the House's, actually balances. The Republican-controlled Senate, readers might recall, was part of that "extreme" and "irresponsible" Legislature Democrats claimed the state had to run from. It's funny how political rhetoric can collide so harshly with political reality.
READER COMMENTS: 0
- Video: British hostage beheaded by ISIS - 14
- To remember the POW and MIA: Recognition Day ceremony in Boscawen - 0
- Goffstown High grad finishes Air Force training - 0
- JFK picture on side of Dallas tour bus draws ire, threats - 0
- Yellowstone tourist fined for crashed drone - 0
- FBI chief claims killer of Foley and Sotloff is identified - 0
- FBI says militant in beheading videos ID'd; about a dozen from U.S. have fought with militants in Syria - 0
- U.S., Arab partners launch first strikes on Islamic State in Syria - 16
- Obama to make statement after airstrikes against Islamic State, White House official says - 3
READER COMMENTS: 0
- Kuster's abortion lies: Claims against Garcia are untrue - 0
- Brown, Shaheen run hardest where support is deepest - 0
- Drew Cline: GOP missed opportunities could mean trouble on Tuesday - 0
- College Football: Big Green ready for tussle with Harvard - 0
- Report: Cubs will hire Joe Maddon as manager - 0
- Pastoral Counseling Services honors Good Samaritans - 0
- Peterborough church plan advances after land buy - 0
- Stocks down a little after Fed move - 0
- Portsmouth retailer sells goods from across U.S. in a small 'pop-up shop' - 0
The Obamaconomy: Shea-Porter shows its flaw