Apr 19, 2014
Apr 10, 2014
Apr 3, 2014
Mar 12, 2014
Judge rules Florida man did not act in self defense in shootings
Gabriel Mobley is charged with two counts of second-degree murder for the February 2008 killings of Jason Jesus Gonzalez and Rolando Carrazana, both 24.
Circuit Judge Thomas Rebull's decision means Mobley will now face a jury trial. While Rebull did not grant Mobley "immunity," he can still argue self-defense at a jury trial.
"It was a tough decision, but we think the judge properly reviewed the evidence," prosecutor Kathleen Hoague said. "This case really needs to be considered by a jury."
On the night of the shooting, an argument between two groups of men escalated when Gonzalez punched one of Mobley's pals in the restaurant parking lot.
Mobley, who had a concealed weapons permit and cooperated with police, pulled a pistol and shot the men dead. At a Stand Your Ground hearing in January, Mobley claimed he saw Carranza rushing up and thought he had a weapon.
"I was scared, and then I seen this other guy coming up from the back and then he reached up under his shirt so I was scared," Mobley testified. "I thought, you know, they were going to shoot or kill us."
Prosecutors charged Mobley five months later after analyzing surveillance video of the shooting.
The shooting was seen as a key test of Florida's controversial Stand Your Ground law, which eliminated a citizen's "duty to retreat" before using lethal force in the face of a threat.
The law also gave judges greater leeway to throw out criminal charges if they deemed somebody acted in self-defense. In Miami-Dade, so far, judges have thrown out three murder cases based on the law.
The law came under national scrutiny last year when a man claimed self-defense when he killed an unarmed teen, Trayvon Martin, during a physical fight in Sanford. George Zimmerman was eventually charged with second-degree murder and is awaiting trial.
READER COMMENTS: 0
- Citizens Bank robbed Saturday in Manchester - 0
- Four burglaries reported in Manchester on Thursday - 0
- Manchester woman arrested twice in two days - 1
- Police say trio used Craigslist to lure, rob contractor - 7
- Burglars take $210K in cash from safe in Salem home - 0
- Judge rejects new rape trial for ex-Salem planning board member - 0
- Manchester Crimewatch: Man accused of writing company checks to himself - 0
- Police say man clocked doing 100 on Route 11 in Wilmot - 0
- Portsmouth arrests 2 for heroin sales - 5
READER COMMENTS: 0
- Garry Rayno's State House Dome: It's time to make legislative sausage - 0
- Memory of bombings remains vivid for those who were there - 0
- Ted Siefer's City Hall: No power play in aldermanic chambers, mayor in good spirits - 1
- On Baseball: Locke pitches game in minor league rehab - 0
- NH's top prospects happy to be part of Boston - 0
- Relative newcomers vie for Boston title - 0
- NH College Notebook: Franklin Pierce's King named to 18U coaching staff - 0
- Andy Schachat's On the Run: New Hampshire makes a big deal about Boston Marathon - 0
- Another View - Ahad Fazelat: How Medicare reimbursement numbers are misleading - 0
Man electrocuted at Keene brush fire
A cellphone ban: Ignoring inconvenient data
Mike Cote's Business Editor's Notebook: Restaurant owner faces up to challenge of Obamacare
'He is risen': 'As he said'
Havenstein: 'I'm a pro-choice Republican'
- Mass. Supreme Judicial Court has found upskirt photos taken on a subway aren't illegal. Should such voyeurism be a crime?
- Total Votes: 917