Sep 4, 2014
Aug 28, 2014
Aug 21, 2014
Aug 14, 2014
Auburn officer's charges dropped
The decision to not prosecute David Flight, 52, happened just two weeks before he was to go on trial in Rockingham County Superior Court on charges of receiving stolen property and theft by unauthorized taking.
Flight was accused of stealing a Remington 30-06 that was seized on Dec. 6, 1992, from a home of a man believed to be a felon.
The information gleaned from an initial investigation that began last January did not give the full picture of how Flight - a former prosecutor and evidence officer for the department - came to ultimately have the gun, prosecutors said on Tuesday.
"New credible, evidence regarding the circumstances under which Flight took possession of the weapon has been found," Assistant Attorney General Ben Agati said. "These circumstances and this new evidence will make it difficult for us to go forward and prove the case."
Agati said he could not release any information about the new evidence or information that came to light since Flight's indictment by a grand jury in September.
A state prosecutor came to the Brentwood courthouse on Tuesday around noon to officially dismiss the charges.
Flight's attorney, Eric Wilson, said he appreciated that the Attorney General's Office was willing to further investigate the case which led to the dismissal.
"David has maintained that he did nothing wrong," Wilson said. "Our position is that these charges should not have been brought."
Wilson declined to get into specifics about the new information that led to the dismissal.
"Dave is now working on getting his reputation back," he said.
Flight was a 21-year veteran of the Auburn Police Department when he retired in 2010 in the wake of a town audit that rendered inconclusive results on missing inventory from the department's evidence room.
Neither the police nor town officials ever said what went missing, but Auburn Town Administrator Bill Herman last fall that the 2010 probe did not deal with a stolen firearm.
"I can't provide any details of our internal investigation," Herman said following Flight's indictment in September. "But I can explicitly say, based on what you described, this is not what the town was dealing with in 2010."
READER COMMENTS: 0
- Gunman hits Circle K convenience store in Durham - 0
- Nashua man charged in domestic knife threat - 0
- Manchester man detained on Nashua rape charges involving child - 0
- Pair accused in Hampstead home invasion also face witness tampering charges - 0
- Widow of chiropractor killed this summer says fatal shooting was no accident - 1
- Alleged accomplice in brutal Bedford home invasion, attack on doctor and wife, says his testimony was coerced - 0
- Man claims rights were violated during investigation - 0
- DWI license revocations - 0
- Salem man arrested for alleged bathroom videotaping - 0
READER COMMENTS: 0
- UPS driver charged in hit-and-run at Merrimack business - 0
- Bella, a chihuahua mix, is still missing in Auburn - 0
- Suicide car bomber kills 3 foreign troops in Afghan capital; Taliban claims responsibility - 0
- City officials to review proposed 'spice' ban - 0
- Manchester's Delana Curtis is left out in the cold - 0
- Another View -- Sharon Day: The Democrats' claim to be the party for women is just not believable - 14
- Dave D'Onofrio's Patriots Notebook: Brady a realist - 0
- Burning rubber: And public dollars - 0
- Obama to announce ramped-up efforts to beat Ebola - 0
DWI license revocations
Mexican man pleads guilty in international conspiracy to traffic hundreds of pounds of cocaine
Attorney claims illegal phone seizure following Christmas Eve accident that killed Brookline mom
Another View -- Sharon Day: The Democrats' claim to be the party for women is just not believable
Seabrook mom pleads not guilty by reason of insanity to attempted murder of her two children
Alleged accomplice in brutal Bedford home invasion, attack on doctor and wife, says his testimony was coerced
Man accused of raping 13-year old in Nashua
- Mass. Supreme Judicial Court has found upskirt photos taken on a subway aren't illegal. Should such voyeurism be a crime?
- Total Votes: 917