New Hampshire Union Leader
Wed, May. 22

Welcome guest, you have 2 views left. | Register | Sign In
News | Sports | Business | A&E | Opinion

Home » News » Politics

RGGI money eyed by NH House for low-income families



CONCORD - The House wants money generated by the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) to go to low-income families through energy efficiency programs.

House Bill 630 would have originally repealed the program, but was changed to dedicate money to low-income families for energy efficiency work on their homes.

The bill was approved by the House Wednesday.

Under the cap and trade program, fossil fuel emissions are limited and electric generators have to pay if they exceed the limits by purchasing "allowances."

The proceeds from allowance auctions go to reduce electric rates for consumers and to energy conservation programs run by the state's electric utilities.

The bill dedicates 20 percent of the energy conservation money to help low-income home owners.

House Science, Technology and Energy Committee Chairman David Borden, D-New Castle, said there are 89,000 homes owned by low-income families in the state. They often consume more energy and pay a higher per unit cost, he said.

An investment of $1,000 in energy efficiency work generally produces about $250 in savings every year, he said.

However, some members wanted to see the program repealed, including House Republican Alliance co-chair Rep Pam Tucker, R-Greenland.

With New Hampshire's high energy costs, lawmakers ought to be voting to repeal the program, she said.

Americans for Prosperity New Hampshire agrees, saying the program needs to be halted.

"RGGI is a destructive scheme that takes money from the ratepayers of New Hampshire to give contributions to the politically well-connected," said Greg Moore, AFP-NH state director. "When we have among the highest energy costs in the nation, we need to be looking for ways to cut the impact on our consumers and make our state more competitive, so that we can grow our economy and bring more new jobs here."

But for House Majority Leader Steve Shurtleff, D-Concord, energy efficiency is the most effective way to create energy independence. Currently those most in need of energy efficiency - low income families - have it the least and the bill would help to remedy that situation.

Over the past two years, the House voted to repeal RGGI, while the Senate wanted to modify the program. Two years ago, the bill died when the Senate failed to override former Gov. John Lynch's veto.

Last year lawmakers reached a compromise that changed how the money from the allowance auctions was distributed, with most of the money going to rate reductions and energy efficiency programs run by the utilities companies.

The bill now goes to the Senate for action.

grayno@unionleader.com




Comments


To improve the chance of seeing your comment posted here or published in the New Hampshire Union Leader:

Note: Comments are the opinion of the respective poster and not of the publisher.

HARRIET CADY said:

As a person who is paying more for telephone bills because the "DO-GOODERs" supposedly representing all ratepayers have over ten years ago instituted the USF "Fee" so that 85% of libraries and schools could be hooked up to the intenet and then the fee would go away I resent the redirecting of RGGI.USF instead of going away is being used for free cell phones, etc. While I on retirement pay for mine and will end up with all savings gone shortly and in need of one myself I feel the Congress's vote on this is Unconstitutional and I request my Consgresional reps to immediately introduce a repeal.Then if the state votes to use RGGI for poor people once again I pay more for electricity to subsidize that which should not be happening. The money from the law was meant to deleiver cleaner air not cleaner pockets of those who have to the light bills.
(Report Abuse)

March 21, 2013 8:16 am

Peter Walker said:

RGGI should have been repealed years ago it is raising the rates of everyone who pays for electricity. Rates are already sky high without this added cost. New Hampshire urgently needs cheaper electricity and this is only making a bad situation worse!
(Report Abuse)

March 21, 2013 3:14 pm

Post a comment


You must sign in before you can post comments. If you are experiencing issues with your account please e-mail abuse@unionleader.com.



View Full Site | Subscribe | Deal of the Day | Contact Us

© Union Leader Corp.