UPDATED: House backs tobacco tax hike by 20 cents per pack
By GARRY RAYNO
State House Bureau
Published Mar 20, 2013 at 12:35 pm
(Updated Mar 20, 2013)
CONCORD -- After a two-year reprieve, smokers could be paying more for their cigarettes and other tobacco products.
The House Wednesday voted 193-167 to approve House Bill 659, which increases the cigarette tax by 20 cents — from $1.68 to $1.88 per pack — beginning July 1.
The increase would provide about $20 million a year in additional state revenue.
The vote was largely down party lines with 10 Republicans voting in favor of the increase and 17 Democrats voting against it.
Republicans say the tax has more than doubled in the last 10 years and is undercutting the state’s ability to attract out-of-state residents to purchase cigarettes and other products such as gasoline, liquor and lottery tickets.
“When we raise the tobacco tax, we are saying don’t bother to come to New Hampshire, we don’t need your money,” said Rep. Laurie Sanborn, R-Bedford, “Talk to businesses on Main Street right now and they will tell you what they need are more customers.”
But bill supporters said the state needs the additional money to begin restoring the services and programs cut during the last term, and increasing the tax would discourage young people from smoking.
“The primary intent of this bill is revenue that we need to begin repairing the damage done last term to services,” said House Ways and Means Committee Chair Susan Almy, D-Lebanon. “The secondary intent is to discourage young people from smoking. When you smoke as a teen, you have a much harder time quitting than anyone else.”
She argued the increase in the tobacco tax would still maintain the state’s advantage over bordering states whose taxes on tobacco are much higher.
“Retailers should be able to maintain the New Hampshire advantage with these prices,” Almy said. “The big problem is gas prices have gone up a lot and people are not willing to drive any distance to buy cigarettes.”
House Minority Leader Gene Chandler said increasing the tobacco tax is not the way to improve the state’s economy.
“With tobacco sales on the decline and border sales dwindling, the last thing we need is another increase to the tobacco tax,” Chandler said. “This regressive tax not only makes New Hampshire businesses less competitive, but according to the Department of Revenue Administration, will result in 5.4 percent reduction in sales, hurting state revenues.”
Other Republicans called the tax very regressive, saying the biggest impact is on the poor, who smoke in a higher percentage than the rest of the population.
“We are also concerned that this tax increase will (disproportionately) hurt lower income families in our state, who tend to purchase more cigarettes, and ask our colleagues in the Senate to defeat this bill,” Sanborn said after the vote.
Gov. Maggie Hassan included a 30-cent increase in her proposed budget, but the House Ways and Means Committee members refused to go along with the hefty jump.
She said after the Governor and Executive Council meeting Wednesday she would continue to push for the 30-cent increase with lawmakers.
The bill now goes to the Senate where it faces an uncertain future.
Comments
To improve the chance of seeing your comment posted here or published in the New Hampshire Union Leader:
- Identify yourself. Accounts using fake or incomplete names are suspended regardless of the quality of posts.
- Say something new, stay on topic, keep it short.
- Links to outside URLs are discouraged, if used they should be on topic.
- Avoid comments in bad taste, write well, avoid using all capital letters
- Don't cite facts about individuals or businesses without providing a means to verify the claim
- If you see an objectionable comment please click the "Report Abuse" button and be sure to tell us why.
Note: Comments are the opinion of the respective poster and not of the publisher.
John Mercier said:
It will never make it through the Senate; and members of the House in support will see themselves punished come election time.
(Report Abuse)
March 20, 2013 2:07 pm
Joe Moore said:
No, we really don't want you to poison yourself. But as long as you're addicted anyway, we'll just take advantage of you financially while we treat you like a pariah, rather than finding the stones to take these products off the market. Cuz that's just how we roll as a society.
(Report Abuse)
March 20, 2013 2:39 pm
George LeMont said:
Thank you for looking out for the lower income people, you den of vipers and thieves. But keep handing out free condoms to the kids with tax money as if their parents can't afford to buy them, or the kids themselves for that matter. One day I hope the people you claim to be helping rise up and send you running. We can't afford anymore of your help out here in the real world.
(Report Abuse)
March 20, 2013 5:03 pm
Ken Johnson said:
And the only ones who will see a tax increase will be those making more than $250,000...um no, that's $200,000,,um wait how about making more than $50,000. NO, how about those making more than $10,000. Wait..how about just those people who are alive? Yes, that's more like it.
(Report Abuse)
March 20, 2013 7:01 pm
mike porter said:
NH Has no income or sales tax....but NH taxes the hell out of everything else. NH is becoming unaffordable all the way around. By the time we add up all the taxes....a sales or income tax may be cheaper than all the "hidden" taxes this state levy's.
(Report Abuse)
March 20, 2013 7:55 pm
Peter Hudson said:
"Almost "exactly Mr. Porter. I disagree with the sales or income tax, just reduce the spending as the state has done until when, until a ton of Massachusetts people started moving north and want all these services. Live Frugally NH...NH needs to cut the baloney... It will become a haven to buy things here, but not live. NH will tax us to death.
(Report Abuse)
March 21, 2013 8:05 am
Donny York said:
"Sin" taxing has raised the cost of cigarettes so that many who need them can't afford them. Given nicotine’s scientifically verified benefit to certain individuals’ successful daily functioning, our most charitable act for many of the less fortunate might be gifting cigarettes to them. If you please, here's my anti-tobacco-tax case in a foot-stomper song:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpXjVq5Q6S0
(Report Abuse)
March 25, 2013 6:03 am
Post a comment
© Union Leader Corp.