New Hampshire Union Leader
Mon, May. 20

Welcome guest, you have 2 views left. | Register | Sign In
News | Sports | Business | A&E | Opinion

Home » Opinion » Columns

Your Turn, NH: Letting knives on flights sets airline security back to before 911



As the son of two parents who work in the airline industry (my mom is a flight attendant and my dad is a pilot), I am shocked and appalled by the Transportation Security Administration's decision to permit small knives on commercial airplanes. The TSA recently announced that it would roll back its prohibition on small knives and various sporting equipment to allow TSA agents to focus on finding items that pose a "larger" threat, such as explosives.

Put simply, this decision is an embarrassment to our national security and will destroy a decade's worth of vigilance and hard work. There are so many things wrong with it that I have a difficult time finding where to begin.

We can start by looking at the justifications given by TSA Administrator John Pistole. Pistole claims that aviation security has improved since 9/11 and that the chances of a similar plot against a commercial airliner are slim. Talk about the epitome of naïveté.

Does Pistole really believe that the threat of terrorism has suddenly dissipated into thin air? Have radical jihadis unanimously decided to stop targeting the West out of frustration or a nascent change of heart? Our military campaign against al-Qaida and affiliated terrorist groups has been effective in the short term, but even an optimist would admit that we are a far cry from eliminating terrorism entirely.

If anything, our actions in the Middle East have facilitated more resentment and inspired future extremists. Why would we want to provide al-Qaida with another chance to attack? After two wars and the loss of thousands of American lives, we're handing our enemy an opportunity to strike at the heart of our country.

Knives have been banned on airplanes for more than 11 years now; how did the TSA come to the conclusion that 2013 was the year when we could stop worrying about these weapons and the threat that they pose to flight crews and passengers?

Pistole has described this decision as part of a broader effort to embrace what he calls 'risk-based security.' Risk-based security emphasizes the detection of liquid explosives, non-metallic IEDs and other sorts of improvised explosives, rather than hand-held weapons.

Apparently the TSA has determined that the former represents a greater threat to airline security than the latter. This is why small knives (no longer than 2.3 inches), hockey sticks, lacrosse sticks, pool cues, ski poles and even golf clubs will be allowed on planes starting April 25. A TSA spokesman can be quoted as saying that these items do not "pose a catastrophic threat to the operation of the aircraft."

While I agree that improvised explosives pose a grave threat to an airplane, I cannot comprehend why the TSA would pardon hand-held weapons. Have we learned nothing from 9/11? The 19 hijackers used hand-held weapons, including box cutters, to overtake the flight crews of all four aircraft.

How can the TSA honestly believe that knives do not pose a catastrophic threat to the operation of the aircraft? If the TSA's recent decision is implemented, the deaths of those flight attendants and pilots on 9/11 will have been in vain.

What's more, former TSA chief Kip Hawley has publicly stated, "they ought to let everything on that is sharp and pointy. Battle axes, machetes. bring anything you want that is pointy and sharp because while you may be able to commit an act of violence, you will not be able to take over the plane. It is as simple as that."

This statement encapsulates an egregious lack of judgment and prescience. According to the 9/11 Commission, pre-9/11 security philosophy generally held that, "other than for guns, large knives, explosives and incendiaries, determining what was prohibited and what was allowable was up to the common sense of the carriers and their screening contractors." The TSA's latest decision will take us back to this negligent climate, completely undermining 11 years of thorough security, attentiveness and diligence.

The TSA exists to save lives and to prevent 9/11 from ever happening again. Believe me, I wait in the same lines as everyone else. I have to go through monotonous security checkpoints. I have to endure the occasional pat down. Yes, it's annoying, but I don't complain because I understand what's at stake. All it takes is a single weapon to slip through security before a terrorist can take the lives of hundreds of innocent people. I was 12 years old on 9/11, and I will always remember how frightened I felt. I pray that I never have to experience it again.

Ethan Gauvin of Stratham is a University of New Hampshire student studying at the University of Oxford in England this semester.




Comments


To improve the chance of seeing your comment posted here or published in the New Hampshire Union Leader:

Note: Comments are the opinion of the respective poster and not of the publisher.

Spike said:

There is no degree of withdrawing rights and confiscating tools from Americans that will guarantee that no mishap will occur, and no way to measure the success of any such effort. The next attempted hijacking will be cited as proof that we need to do more, not that what we have been doing was ineffective. The Transportation Security Administration guarantees nothing, except the tenure of its own hacks, as we keep our airports (and, according to Secretary Napolitano, soon our train and bus stations) militarized, and invade the rights of Americans against unreasonable search and seizure exactly when they are more anxious to get home than to defend those rights.
(Report Abuse)

March 18, 2013 8:07 am

Bob Damon said:

If you read more about this you will see its really not that bad.By allowing these small knives, we are bringing US policy in line with international policy.That means these small knives are already allowed on non US flights, and have been for several years.If you look at the photos of what is allowed, they are very small and while any sharp object has a potential to cause injury, these are many better ways to cause harm, than with blades this small.
(Report Abuse)

March 18, 2013 8:28 am

Bob Lake said:

I thought that republicans wanted everybody armed in movie theaters and schools. Why would they be against everybody having a gun or knife on a plane? Hey, go for it.
(Report Abuse)

March 18, 2013 9:34 am

WAYNE STANLEY said:

The TSA will continue to be a disgrace as long as they conform to the PC directives handed down from Big Sis. Strip searching 12 year old girls and 90 year old grandmas while allowing knives on board just blows my mind. The real reason for this policy change is the ineptness of the TSA at detecting these weapons. As for me, I will continue to drive to Disney and not put up with this crap at the airport.
(Report Abuse)

March 18, 2013 9:55 am

Ken Johnson said:

Bob L.. and what are you going to do Bob if a terrorist tries to take over a plane you're on; cut them with your EBT card? Since you were so quick to bash Republicans you probably forgot that the Messiah and his lying piece of crap Attorney General can't bring themselves to call the War on Terror, the War On Terror. So then, according to President Glassjaw and the Liar Attorney General, we shouldn't need to worry about terrorists because the war on terror is over. Horray!!
(Report Abuse)

March 18, 2013 4:01 pm

George LeMont said:

On the other hand there will be more good people on the plane armed with knives than bad people if they exercise their rights to self protection. Nothing gives bad people an edge like good people doing nothing. But then many of us already know the democrats always side with the criminals in these matters as their leaders enjoy the money and power to hire people to protect them. And if they can't it will be paid for by the very citizens they seek to disarm. It's a great system if you're Kings & Queens.
(Report Abuse)

March 18, 2013 6:23 pm

Gary Kerr said:

ETHAN GAUVIN - With all due respect for the topic and need for security and the tragedy that occurred in NYC on 9/11/2001, don't you mean 9/11 in the title of the article as being an abbreviated date rather than the emergency number to call for medical/fire/police aid? The title reads in-part " . . . back to before 911".
(Report Abuse)

March 18, 2013 8:36 pm

Peter Hudson said:

Jeesh, Bob will you ever stop exercising yourself to Anderson Cooper and Maddow, you'll go blind. Give it up already, you're "stuff" is getting really old and pathetic...But we still have to remove our shoes and MUST purchase "pre-cleared" beverages at 3-4 times the cost. There are devices that check drinks, through the plastic container, to verify if the liquids are dangerous or not... You're bottle of water is dangerous but not a knife... Good job TSA, "drop the bottle of mothers milk for your baby - but go ahead Crocodile Dundee you're all set buddy..."Typical DC mentality... But alas, we know how to pick 'em...
(Report Abuse)

March 19, 2013 4:18 am

Paul Lundwall said:

If all of the passengers were issued guns n 911 it would have never happened.
(Report Abuse)

March 19, 2013 7:31 pm

Post a comment


You must sign in before you can post comments. If you are experiencing issues with your account please e-mail abuse@unionleader.com.



View Full Site | Subscribe | Deal of the Day | Contact Us

© Union Leader Corp.