Home » News » Politics » Town Meetings
March 08. 2013 10:58PM
WINDHAM - A long-awaited new contract for Windham's teachers was the topic of much discussion at Tuesday night's school board meeting.
In response to letters written from citizens concerned about the contract's costs, school board member Stephanie Wimmer, who served on the district's negotiation committee, offered an explanation of the collective bargaining process and the new contract heading before voters Tuesday.
Wimmer said a team consisting of board members, administrators and legal counsel assisted them in the bargaining process.
"We wanted to make sure we were both rewarding our teachers and keeping our responsibility to our taxpayers," Wimmer said.
Since the July 2011 expiration of the Windham teachers' current contract, the laws have changed, Wimmer noted. "One of the big changes we've seen legislatively is health care reform, so we're keeping an eye to those changes," she said.
A new feature of the contract makes provisions for individual teacher ratings and opportunities for high-performing teachers to earn bonuses. Teachers receive an extensive evaluation every three years in the Windham district and under the new contract, those who score high would be eligible for one-time monetary bonuses, which would be separate from their base salaries.
"We did our budget hoping a lot of teachers would be distinguished, but it's not enforced," Wimmer said.
One cost-saving method proposed for next year includes increased co-pays for prescriptions, which Wimmer said could save the district $670,000 next year. Employees will still have several plan options to choose from depending on their family size and budgets. The board urged public support of the contract.
"We have some of the most phenomenal educators in this district," Wimmer said. "Even without a contract for the past two years, they haven't wavered in their commitment to our children."
If voters at the March 12 polls pass the three-year contract, Article 3 would increase the budget by $107,259 next year and by $563,473 the following year. Next year's residential tax impact of Article 3 would be 5 cents per $1,000.
Voters will also decide on Article 4, a three-year contract with the district's instructional assistants. That contract would increase the budget by $64,594 next year and $82,904 the following year if passed. Employees working 30 hours per week or more would also receive $200 towards health insurance for a $200 buyout with proof of coverage. If passed, Article 4 would have a 3-cent per $1,000 tax impact.
aguilmet@newstote.com
Teachers' contract goes to Windham voters
In response to letters written from citizens concerned about the contract's costs, school board member Stephanie Wimmer, who served on the district's negotiation committee, offered an explanation of the collective bargaining process and the new contract heading before voters Tuesday.
Wimmer said a team consisting of board members, administrators and legal counsel assisted them in the bargaining process.
"We wanted to make sure we were both rewarding our teachers and keeping our responsibility to our taxpayers," Wimmer said.
Since the July 2011 expiration of the Windham teachers' current contract, the laws have changed, Wimmer noted. "One of the big changes we've seen legislatively is health care reform, so we're keeping an eye to those changes," she said.
A new feature of the contract makes provisions for individual teacher ratings and opportunities for high-performing teachers to earn bonuses. Teachers receive an extensive evaluation every three years in the Windham district and under the new contract, those who score high would be eligible for one-time monetary bonuses, which would be separate from their base salaries.
"We did our budget hoping a lot of teachers would be distinguished, but it's not enforced," Wimmer said.
One cost-saving method proposed for next year includes increased co-pays for prescriptions, which Wimmer said could save the district $670,000 next year. Employees will still have several plan options to choose from depending on their family size and budgets. The board urged public support of the contract.
"We have some of the most phenomenal educators in this district," Wimmer said. "Even without a contract for the past two years, they haven't wavered in their commitment to our children."
If voters at the March 12 polls pass the three-year contract, Article 3 would increase the budget by $107,259 next year and by $563,473 the following year. Next year's residential tax impact of Article 3 would be 5 cents per $1,000.
Voters will also decide on Article 4, a three-year contract with the district's instructional assistants. That contract would increase the budget by $64,594 next year and $82,904 the following year if passed. Employees working 30 hours per week or more would also receive $200 towards health insurance for a $200 buyout with proof of coverage. If passed, Article 4 would have a 3-cent per $1,000 tax impact.
aguilmet@newstote.com
- Sanbornton voters add money back into budget - 0
- Sanbornton voters say no to SB 2 - 0
- Old building, new roads on Peterborough warrant - 0
- Sanbornton to vote again on SB2 - 0
- Employee pay, dump trucks key Sanbornton warrant - 0
- Proposed New London budget shows 3 percent increase - 0
- Conway voters ok school budget, but reject teacher's contract - 0
- Ortega, Barnes reelected to Merrimack School Board - 0
- Merrimack polls open today - 0
New London voters approve $7.2m operating budget
READER COMMENTS: 0- Animal Rescue League names Volunteer of Year - 0
- NH Business People: State Motors receives top dealer honor - 0
- Exeter company launches refrigerated dog food line - 0
- Gorham mill's new CEO aims for niche market - 0
- John Cunningham: Limited liability corporations can be like marriages - incompatible - 0
- AG says Belmont murder victims were mother and son, found hacked to death - 1
- Ossipee man charged with stealing guns, chainsaw - 0
- Fourth person arrested in Hollis home invasion - 0
- Sox in the city: World champs' appearance highlighted Gill Stadium opening - 0
No one injured in Manchester police cruiser crash
READER COMMENTS: 0
Sorry, no question available



