Home » News » Crime
March 05. 2013 9:13PM
MOONEY
BRENTWOOD - A Concord lawyer charged with hiring a prostitute and later tipping her off that she was under police surveillance is arguing that police did not have enough evidence to pull him over after he was seen leaving a hotel room.
Richard Mooney, 53, of Bow has asked a judge to dismiss misdemeanor charges of prostitution and hindering apprehension before his April 1 trial in Rockingham County Superior Court. Mooney appealed his case from 10th Circuit Court in Salem last March, so it could be heard by a jury.
If a judge decides that Salem police did not have enough legal justification to stop Mooney's car, then the charges may have to be dropped. Defense attorney Howard Roever is asking Judge Marguerite Wageling to dismiss the case without a hearing. Prosecutors have yet to respond to Mooney's claim.
Mooney was charged by Salem police after an investigation on June 13, 2011. Police began surveillance at two local hotels after receiving a tip that a woman named "Ashley" began advertising her services on the website backpage.com, according to court documents.
A detective spotted Mooney's vehicle pull into a parking spot in front of the hotel, enter a room and leave a short time later.
"The fact that a middle-aged male entered and left Room 145 could not form the necessary basis to later initiate a traffic stop under the circumstances," Roever said in a court motion.
One hotel manager told police that she suspected there was "illegal activity" happening in three of the rooms rented by a man. But the detective watching Mooney, "saw no other activities in any of the room(s) that would confirm the information supplied by the motel manager that there was 'heavy traffic' in the rooms rented .indicating criminal activity," according to Roever.
Police said that Mooney refused to speak with them after being pulled over in his car and identified by officers. But the prostitute, police said, told detectives that Mooney called her moments after his encounter with police officers to warn her that she was being watched by law enforcement.
The woman was given limited immunity in exchange for her sworn testimony, according to prosecutors. She was not charged in the case. Her testimony cannot be used against her so long as she testifies truthfully during the trial, court records say.
Mooney is facing two Class A misdemeanors, each punishable by up to a year in county jail and a $2,000 fine.
No hearing date has been set on Mooney's argument about the evidence.
jkimble@newstote.com
Concord lawyer asks judge to throw out prostitution, hindering charges
MOONEY
Richard Mooney, 53, of Bow has asked a judge to dismiss misdemeanor charges of prostitution and hindering apprehension before his April 1 trial in Rockingham County Superior Court. Mooney appealed his case from 10th Circuit Court in Salem last March, so it could be heard by a jury.
If a judge decides that Salem police did not have enough legal justification to stop Mooney's car, then the charges may have to be dropped. Defense attorney Howard Roever is asking Judge Marguerite Wageling to dismiss the case without a hearing. Prosecutors have yet to respond to Mooney's claim.
Mooney was charged by Salem police after an investigation on June 13, 2011. Police began surveillance at two local hotels after receiving a tip that a woman named "Ashley" began advertising her services on the website backpage.com, according to court documents.
A detective spotted Mooney's vehicle pull into a parking spot in front of the hotel, enter a room and leave a short time later.
"The fact that a middle-aged male entered and left Room 145 could not form the necessary basis to later initiate a traffic stop under the circumstances," Roever said in a court motion.
One hotel manager told police that she suspected there was "illegal activity" happening in three of the rooms rented by a man. But the detective watching Mooney, "saw no other activities in any of the room(s) that would confirm the information supplied by the motel manager that there was 'heavy traffic' in the rooms rented .indicating criminal activity," according to Roever.
Police said that Mooney refused to speak with them after being pulled over in his car and identified by officers. But the prostitute, police said, told detectives that Mooney called her moments after his encounter with police officers to warn her that she was being watched by law enforcement.
The woman was given limited immunity in exchange for her sworn testimony, according to prosecutors. She was not charged in the case. Her testimony cannot be used against her so long as she testifies truthfully during the trial, court records say.
Mooney is facing two Class A misdemeanors, each punishable by up to a year in county jail and a $2,000 fine.
No hearing date has been set on Mooney's argument about the evidence.
jkimble@newstote.com
- Mass. residents charged after Hollis man beaten and stabbed - 2
- Judge gives Salem engineer with underwater mortgage year in jail for growing pot - 1
- Teen party takes Derry rep by surprise - 24
- Not-guilty plea expected in death at Danville chief's home - 20
- Police say woman was assaulted for hours - 5
- Inmate will let judge decide fraud ID case - 0
- Dzhokhar Tsarnaev left ‘deathbed’ note inside boat, source says - 0
- Manchester police officer found not guilty of simple assault - 20
- Dartmouth student charged with rape of another student - 0
Mass. men arrested on drugs, weapons charges
READER COMMENTS: 0- John Habib's City Sports: Tourney time nears for JVs, too - 0
- Lawyer says Northern Pass in 'a corner' - 0
- Fisher Cats score in 9th to win - 0
- Sox edge Twins in 10, 3-2 - 0
- Nashua man arrested on charges of sexually assaulting underage girl - 0
- Memorial boys take city track meet for 10th straight year - 0
- NHIAA Baseball: Penmen win again - 0
- Ceremony for fallen police officers honors service and sacrifice - 0
- IRS head says Tea Party was not a target - 1
NHIAA Tennis: Bedford is championship-focused
READER COMMENTS: 0| Follow us: | ||
 |
 |
 |
- Should applicants for jobless benefits have to pass a drug test?
- Yes
- 78%
- No
- 22%
- Total Votes: 1424