Conviction of woman who got ex-husband and son to kill husband upheld.


On appeal, she argues that the trial court erred when it: instructed the jury that, where a case involves both direct and circumstantial evidence, the evidence does not have to exclude all rational conclusions other than the defendant's guilt; found that the defendant consented to a general rather than a limited search of her home; and did not address the constitutionality of the warrant to search the home. We affirm.


To improve the chance of seeing your comment posted here or published in the New Hampshire Union Leader:

  • Identify yourself. Accounts using fake or incomplete names are suspended regardless of the quality of posts.
  • Say something new, stay on topic, keep it short.
  • Links to outside URLs are discouraged, if used they should be on topic.
  • Avoid comments in bad taste, write well, avoid using all capital letters
  • Don't cite facts about individuals or businesses without providing a means to verify the claim
  • If you see an objectionable comment please click the "Report Abuse" button and be sure to tell us why.

Note: Comments are the opinion of the respective poster and not of the publisher.

Be the first to comment.

Post a comment

You must sign in before you can post comments. If you are experiencing issues with your account please e-mail