Home » Opinion » Editorials
Opt out: Say no to Medicaid expansion
Now that it can do so without penalty thanks to Thursday’s Supreme Court ruling on the Affordable Care Act, New Hampshire should opt out of the act’s unnecessary and expensive Medicaid expansion. Unfortunately, the state will probably need a new governor to make that happen.
Obamacare achieved a good deal of its “universal” health insurance coverage not by making insurance more affordable or improving the system, but by making more people eligible for Medicaid. The law required states to offer Medicaid coverage to eligible households with incomes of up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level.
New Hampshire has long set Medicaid eligibility at 63 percent of the poverty level. The federal government is to pay 95 percent of the cost of those new enrollees — for now. But the changes also required states to more aggressively pursue people who were eligible under the old rules but had not signed up. The states would be responsible for 100 percent of the costs of those new enrollees. The changes were estimated to cost the state about $30 million a year.
New Hampshire simply cannot afford that. But Gov. John Lynch never raised a forceful public objection to the expansion. While other governors strongly opposed the Medicaid expansion, Lynch made a few meek statements of concern.
On Thursday, the Supreme Court ruled that the expansion was unconstitutional because the law did not simply adjust the Medicare law, but “transformed” the program. States now have the option of saying no to the new enrollment plan and keeping their existing Medicaid guidelines. New Hampshire cannot afford any expansion, so it needs to opt out. But can we count on Lynch to do that? Probably not.
That would leave this overdue and necessary act to the next governor.
Voters need to ask the candidates how they would handle that decision. Tens of millions of dollars — a year — hang in the balance.
READER COMMENTS: 7
- Winnipesaukee watershed association looking to raise its profile - 0
- New Ipswich cemetery’s future is anybody guess after state objects to graves - 1
- Goffstown artisan gives new face to Wolfeboro tower - 0
- Town may have to fix grave error - 3
- Updated: Winning Powerball ticket sold in Fla.; 2, $1M tickets sold in NH - 0
- No more Winni whoppers: Fishing Derby winner will have to take lie detector test - 11
- Learning the way of the gun in Wakefield - 2
- Peterborough's renovated Adams Pool to open in June - 0
- Supreme Court says Manchester man who lost towed car while hospitalized can sue - 4
READER COMMENTS: 23
- Updated: House votes to ban lead sinkers and jigs an ounce or under - 9
- Updated: Car may have started itself, crashes, burns at Manchester Home Depot - 5
- Threats at Goffstown High ‘not credible’ - 0
- Updated: House passes auto dealers bill of rights - 2
- Rochester man facing up to 30 years in prison for brutal assault - 1
- Man who confronts burglar in Nashua gets bit - 0
- Police say Nashua man struck woman with Jeep - 0
- Pease chosen to receive new KC-46A refueling tanker; to bring 100 jobs - 9
- FBI agent kills Florida man during questioning about Marathon bombing suspect - 3
License revocations for DWI announced
Consider Nevada: Gambling always expands