Home » Opinion » Editorials
June 14. 2012 8:27PM
Genius school budget? Not even close
Said Manchester School Board member Kathy Staub after the aldermen passed Alderman Joyce Craig's budget, which gave an additional $2 million to city schools, “I was delighted that Joyce Craig found a way to get the school district what they asked for but lower everyone's taxes. She's a genius.”
Be thankful, parents, that neither Staub nor Craig teaches personal finance in the city school system.
Craig's “genius” was to spend one-time money, much of it available because of unanticipated budget savings, and give it to the school system to be spent on teachers. It was hardly an innovation. The city has repeatedly used one-time money to pay operating expenses.
In 2003, aldermen passed a budget that, like Craig's, came with a lower tax rate than the mayor's proposal, but only because it included $1.6 million in non-recurring funds, including $650,000 from land sales that were not identified — the aldermen simply assumed they could sell that much city property.
In 2007, aldermen passed a budget that delivered a bigger tax cut than the mayor had proposed, but they reached that number by draining $3.5 million from the city's $5.3 million economic development reserve fund and spending it on operating expenses.
For years, city school budgets have been inflated by one-time revenues, often from the school district's expendable trusts. Those special accounts were drained of millions of dollars to pay for operating expenses in 2009 and 2011. In 2010, federal stimulus money was used.
Earlier this year, a city teacher complained of the “crazy” way the city handles its school budget. Year after year teachers get pink slips in the spring and then have to wait until July to see if their positions are actually cut. Why does this happen? Because the aldermen and school board create budget holes by approving spending the city cannot afford. They issue pink slips just in case they cannot find enough money by the end of the year to cover all the spending they've approved. At the last minute, they fill some of the budget holes with whatever one-time money they can find, and they fire enough teachers to fill the rest. The whole process starts again the following year.
That's not genius. That's crazy. And aldermen just kept the process going for another year.
Be thankful, parents, that neither Staub nor Craig teaches personal finance in the city school system.
Craig's “genius” was to spend one-time money, much of it available because of unanticipated budget savings, and give it to the school system to be spent on teachers. It was hardly an innovation. The city has repeatedly used one-time money to pay operating expenses.
In 2003, aldermen passed a budget that, like Craig's, came with a lower tax rate than the mayor's proposal, but only because it included $1.6 million in non-recurring funds, including $650,000 from land sales that were not identified — the aldermen simply assumed they could sell that much city property.
In 2007, aldermen passed a budget that delivered a bigger tax cut than the mayor had proposed, but they reached that number by draining $3.5 million from the city's $5.3 million economic development reserve fund and spending it on operating expenses.
For years, city school budgets have been inflated by one-time revenues, often from the school district's expendable trusts. Those special accounts were drained of millions of dollars to pay for operating expenses in 2009 and 2011. In 2010, federal stimulus money was used.
Earlier this year, a city teacher complained of the “crazy” way the city handles its school budget. Year after year teachers get pink slips in the spring and then have to wait until July to see if their positions are actually cut. Why does this happen? Because the aldermen and school board create budget holes by approving spending the city cannot afford. They issue pink slips just in case they cannot find enough money by the end of the year to cover all the spending they've approved. At the last minute, they fill some of the budget holes with whatever one-time money they can find, and they fire enough teachers to fill the rest. The whole process starts again the following year.
That's not genius. That's crazy. And aldermen just kept the process going for another year.
- Data overreach Are programs really justified? The weak case for PRISM. - 11
- A Medicaid reduction? That is not likely - 8
- Border security? Maybe, some day, perhaps. Or not - 34
- Priority profs: University system tops HHS - 5
- Recognizing father: Not PC, but still OK - 1
- Closing Hanover St.: Not a 'free market' move - 6
- Step into the past: Discover old NH this weekend - 0
- Racial harmony: On preferences, it exists - 8
- School accountability: It is up to the parents - 12
School board papers: Beaudry gets left behind
READER COMMENTS: 0- Driver rescued after Franklin crash, 50-foot plunge - 0
- Storms knock out power to about 3,600 PSNH customers - 0
- Nashua couple's deaths called suspicious - 0
- American Medical Response back in good graces of key Manchester officials - 0
- Lebanon’s Colette Schmidt captures N.E. girls’ golf tourney crown - 0
- Sixteen make cut at State Am qualifying - 0
- Granite Stater Matt Bonner in position for another NBA title - 0
- Clippers, Celtics resume talks on Doc, Garnett deal - 0
- Hampton man indicted for distributing child porn - 0
Enfield fire leaves one burned
READER COMMENTS: 0
Sorry, no question available



