Home » News
June 14. 2012 8:27PM
Suncook committee ends management bid
A regional committee officially ended its bid to nominate the Suncook River for the state's Rivers Management and Protection Program, after all but one town of the original seven involved withdrew from the project.
The Suncook River Nomination Committee, in a statement, cited a lack of community support as its reason for disbanding.
Originally formed with representatives from Allenstown, Barnstead, Chichester, Epsom, Gilmanton, Pembroke and Pittsfield, the committee sought to earn the Suncook River a spot in the state program that would create a local advisory council to protect the quality of the river.
When a river is nominated by its surrounding communities, the nominating committee must prove an adequate level of local support for the project before the legislature will consider granting an official designation for protection.
Vanessa Goold, principal planner at the Central New Hampshire Regional Planning Commission, said the Suncook committee members did not believe they had enough support after six of the towns dropped out, leaving only Allenstown on board.
“As we went through the nomination process, there were a lot of public meetings to let people know what the nomination meant and didn't mean,” she said. “During that process, a number of people came to various meetings and had a lot of concerns and questions about the program.”
Allenstown Police Chief Shaun Mulholland, who served on the nominating committee, attributed the lack of widespread support to misinformation about the powers of the advisory council.
“There's a misconception that this would give (the Department of Environmental Services) broad authority to regulate people's lands along the river,” he said. “It was sufficient enough to derail the process, and now unfortunately there's no entity that will allow the local communities to work together to address river issues.”
Mulholland said the council would only be able to act in an advisory capacity, without any sort of statutory authority. Allenstown continued to back the nomination project in hopes that the towns along the river would be able to join forces on issues like flooding.
“It's really up to each individual town, and obviously Allenstown supported it,” said Allenstown town administrator Paul Apple. ”But some of our neighboring communities did not. From an Allenstown perspective, it is a bit of a disappointment.”
Goold, from the planning commission, said any town or group of municipalities can seek nomination for any river or just a segment of it, meaning Allenstown could have continued the process on its own.
“They could have gone forward just as a single town with a single segment of river, but they really wanted to be part of a regional community effort,” she said.
Mulholland said that the program's benefit for Allenstown would have been the creation of a body fostering regional cooperation on river issues.
“We don't have that right now,” he said. “The primary focus that Allenstown was looking at was to work with our neighboring communities.”
klannan@newstote.com
The Suncook River Nomination Committee, in a statement, cited a lack of community support as its reason for disbanding.
Originally formed with representatives from Allenstown, Barnstead, Chichester, Epsom, Gilmanton, Pembroke and Pittsfield, the committee sought to earn the Suncook River a spot in the state program that would create a local advisory council to protect the quality of the river.
When a river is nominated by its surrounding communities, the nominating committee must prove an adequate level of local support for the project before the legislature will consider granting an official designation for protection.
Vanessa Goold, principal planner at the Central New Hampshire Regional Planning Commission, said the Suncook committee members did not believe they had enough support after six of the towns dropped out, leaving only Allenstown on board.
“As we went through the nomination process, there were a lot of public meetings to let people know what the nomination meant and didn't mean,” she said. “During that process, a number of people came to various meetings and had a lot of concerns and questions about the program.”
Allenstown Police Chief Shaun Mulholland, who served on the nominating committee, attributed the lack of widespread support to misinformation about the powers of the advisory council.
“There's a misconception that this would give (the Department of Environmental Services) broad authority to regulate people's lands along the river,” he said. “It was sufficient enough to derail the process, and now unfortunately there's no entity that will allow the local communities to work together to address river issues.”
Mulholland said the council would only be able to act in an advisory capacity, without any sort of statutory authority. Allenstown continued to back the nomination project in hopes that the towns along the river would be able to join forces on issues like flooding.
“It's really up to each individual town, and obviously Allenstown supported it,” said Allenstown town administrator Paul Apple. ”But some of our neighboring communities did not. From an Allenstown perspective, it is a bit of a disappointment.”
Goold, from the planning commission, said any town or group of municipalities can seek nomination for any river or just a segment of it, meaning Allenstown could have continued the process on its own.
“They could have gone forward just as a single town with a single segment of river, but they really wanted to be part of a regional community effort,” she said.
Mulholland said that the program's benefit for Allenstown would have been the creation of a body fostering regional cooperation on river issues.
“We don't have that right now,” he said. “The primary focus that Allenstown was looking at was to work with our neighboring communities.”
klannan@newstote.com
- Fisher Cats score in 9th to win - 0
- Former NASCAR driver Trickle dead in apparent suicide - 0
- NHIAA boxscores, summaries for May 14, 2013 - 0
- Manchester's Gill Stadium nearing centenial rededication, still going strong - 0
- Red Sox lose to Rangers - 0
- Glenn, Nolan power Fisher Cats to win - 0
- All done: Monarchs elminated from AHL playoffs three games to one - 0
- NH College Roundup: Evans in Pats' rookie camp - 0
- Derryfield defeats Central girls in lacrosse - 0
NH College Notebook: Honors keep coming for several Granite State athletes
READER COMMENTS: 0- Gambling bill scuttled, 'Now it is going to be really tough' for budget - 2
- NHIAA Roundup: BG girls’ tennis team sweeps Pinkerton - 0
- NHIAA box scores, summaries for May 22 - 0
- Officials say Goffstown High ‘safe’ after threat of violence - 0
- Manchester Community College graduates told ‘speak your minds’ - 0
- Portsmouth manhunt suspect turns himself in to police - 0
- Nurse said Exeter Hospital is making her a ‘scapegoat’ in hepatitis case - 0
- Derry council defends officials' purchases - 0
- Nashua librarian reports E-books flying off virtual shelves - 0
Buchholz moves to 7-0 as Red Sox post win
READER COMMENTS: 0- Should adultery remain a crime under U.S. military law?
- Yes
- 42%
- No
- 58%
- Total Votes: 641



