Home » Local Voices » Drew Cline
June 14. 2012 12:42PM
Romney's message: Obama's failed policies of the present
Judging by buzz from Democrats, President Obama's economic speech today will hit an old theme: "the failed policies of the past."
Unable to defend his record ($15.7 trillion in federal debt, with 8.2 percent unemployment to go with it), Obama will attack. He will shift the blame to Bush, to deregulation, to the anarchy that supposedly reigned in America before he took office and restored sensible government oversight of the economy. Electing Romney will simply return us to that bad old time in which Republicans allowed the rich to prey on the middle class.
Romney should not let himself get trapped in a grand defense of deregulation or of any other specific Republican policy that predated Obama. He should smile and say that the policies of 30, 20, or even 10 years ago are not on trial here. Obama, in fact, had two years in which to implement his economic agenda unrestrained by Republican objections. In that time, he chose to pursue Obamacare, the stimulus, Dodd-Frank, Solyndra, and bailouts of big companies. After voters in 2010 sent him the clear message that they wanted this carnival of spending and government growth to stop, he kept it up. So far (and that's important -- he's not done yet!) Obama has accumulated twice the federal debt in a single term that George W. Bush did in two terms -- even though he told us he'd cut the deficit in half.
This election is not about the policies of the past, it is about the failed policies of the present. It is about the complete failure of this administration to do what the President assured us he would do: restore prosperity through smart, responsible governing.
Then Romney should lay out his plan for doing that and point out not only where it differs from Obama, but where it differs from George W. Bush. This will reassure both independents who voted for Obama in 2008 and are now disillusioned AND the Republican base that Romney will not follow the Bush-Obama path of growing government and its debt, but will chart a new, fiscally responsible path that frees the economy while maintaining a sensible level of needed government oversight.
Even if he shies away from dinging Bush, he should hit this theme repeatedly: It's not about the past, it's about the failed policies of the present. It will force Obama to defend his actions, if not his record, and remind voters that Obama has had years to fix the mess they are in and has not succeeded.
Unable to defend his record ($15.7 trillion in federal debt, with 8.2 percent unemployment to go with it), Obama will attack. He will shift the blame to Bush, to deregulation, to the anarchy that supposedly reigned in America before he took office and restored sensible government oversight of the economy. Electing Romney will simply return us to that bad old time in which Republicans allowed the rich to prey on the middle class.
Romney should not let himself get trapped in a grand defense of deregulation or of any other specific Republican policy that predated Obama. He should smile and say that the policies of 30, 20, or even 10 years ago are not on trial here. Obama, in fact, had two years in which to implement his economic agenda unrestrained by Republican objections. In that time, he chose to pursue Obamacare, the stimulus, Dodd-Frank, Solyndra, and bailouts of big companies. After voters in 2010 sent him the clear message that they wanted this carnival of spending and government growth to stop, he kept it up. So far (and that's important -- he's not done yet!) Obama has accumulated twice the federal debt in a single term that George W. Bush did in two terms -- even though he told us he'd cut the deficit in half.
This election is not about the policies of the past, it is about the failed policies of the present. It is about the complete failure of this administration to do what the President assured us he would do: restore prosperity through smart, responsible governing.
Then Romney should lay out his plan for doing that and point out not only where it differs from Obama, but where it differs from George W. Bush. This will reassure both independents who voted for Obama in 2008 and are now disillusioned AND the Republican base that Romney will not follow the Bush-Obama path of growing government and its debt, but will chart a new, fiscally responsible path that frees the economy while maintaining a sensible level of needed government oversight.
Even if he shies away from dinging Bush, he should hit this theme repeatedly: It's not about the past, it's about the failed policies of the present. It will force Obama to defend his actions, if not his record, and remind voters that Obama has had years to fix the mess they are in and has not succeeded.
- Roaming jihadis: A terrorist visits Manchester - 3
- Athletes and PE: Give them credit for sports - 7
- The EPA's friend: It has a loyal ally in Shea-Porter - 16
- Leading vs. following: Ayotte, Shaheen and the polls - 23
- The cupcake police: Stop! In the name of lard! - 15
- Page One Editorial: Obama is right - 27
- Taxed tips: Another NH revenue grab - 9
- Gosnell and NH: The horror of late-term abortion - 8
- Bridging the night: Bright ideas in Portsmouth - 0
Underestimating NH: Gun control picks two wrong targets
READER COMMENTS: 17- Man shot to death on Manchester street late Saturday - 2
- UNH hires firm to redesign one of its logos - 10
- Disengaged: Obama's lousy excuse - 11
- Ted Siefer's City Hall: School board on the defensive over Cupcake-gate - 1
- Garry Rayno's State House Dome: All eyes on House as casino vote nears - 1
- 43 killers on lifetime parole - but where? - 3
- Official says NH abortion sites need state scrutiny - 13
- Chechen decries Boston attack - 1
- Heroin use, deaths spike in New Hampshire - 1
NY man stable after destroying classic Porsche 911 in Route 16 wreck
READER COMMENTS: 1
Sorry, no question available



