Home » Opinion » Editorials
May 23. 2012 7:41PM
Primaries matter: And upsets happen
New Hampshire is respected nationally as an unusual state where political activism and well-informed debate are a routine part of life. If that civic involvement should ever ebb, one of the best arguments for our state's leadoff presidential primary status will be weakened.
One good indicator of the state's political health is the number of hard-fought, competitive elections. That isn't limited to the general election. Without primaries, any party member who wants a choice — or simply an open debate on the issues before a nominee is chosen — is effectively disenfranchised. A lack of competitive primaries isn't good for the parties or for the state.
In 2012, those vital signs look good. Although the filing period doesn't begin until June 6, expect a line outside of Secretary of State Bill Gardner's door that morning. State Senate primaries were rare two years ago, but there will be at least twice as many this year. Three Republicans hope to fill Ray Wieczorek's seat at the Executive Council table. Both parties' gubernatorial nominations are up for grabs.
Still, according to the conventional political wisdom, many nominations are all but certain. “Insiders” will tell you that the field in many districts has been cleared for the incumbent or a favored newcomer. For instance, you may hear that the pairings for this November's congressional races are set in stone: Frank Guinta vs. Carol Shea-Porter and Charlie Bass vs. Ann McLane Kuster. Their September primaries will be meaningless.
Fortunately, insiders and incumbents are not invulnerable. New Hampshire's election history includes many upsets by little-known candidates. Shea-Porter herself stunned her party's well-funded favorite, House Majority Leader Jim Craig, in a 2006 congressional primary. A decade earlier, U.S. Rep. Bill Zeliff's political career ended with his shocking defeat by Ovide Lamontagne in a gubernatorial primary.
In a presidential election year when public dissatisfaction with politics as usual is higher than ever, upsets are very possible. There are real opportunities in the Sept. 11 primary and in November. The more serious candidates on the ballot, the better.
One good indicator of the state's political health is the number of hard-fought, competitive elections. That isn't limited to the general election. Without primaries, any party member who wants a choice — or simply an open debate on the issues before a nominee is chosen — is effectively disenfranchised. A lack of competitive primaries isn't good for the parties or for the state.
In 2012, those vital signs look good. Although the filing period doesn't begin until June 6, expect a line outside of Secretary of State Bill Gardner's door that morning. State Senate primaries were rare two years ago, but there will be at least twice as many this year. Three Republicans hope to fill Ray Wieczorek's seat at the Executive Council table. Both parties' gubernatorial nominations are up for grabs.
Still, according to the conventional political wisdom, many nominations are all but certain. “Insiders” will tell you that the field in many districts has been cleared for the incumbent or a favored newcomer. For instance, you may hear that the pairings for this November's congressional races are set in stone: Frank Guinta vs. Carol Shea-Porter and Charlie Bass vs. Ann McLane Kuster. Their September primaries will be meaningless.
Fortunately, insiders and incumbents are not invulnerable. New Hampshire's election history includes many upsets by little-known candidates. Shea-Porter herself stunned her party's well-funded favorite, House Majority Leader Jim Craig, in a 2006 congressional primary. A decade earlier, U.S. Rep. Bill Zeliff's political career ended with his shocking defeat by Ovide Lamontagne in a gubernatorial primary.
In a presidential election year when public dissatisfaction with politics as usual is higher than ever, upsets are very possible. There are real opportunities in the Sept. 11 primary and in November. The more serious candidates on the ballot, the better.
- Voter restrictions: Who will govern us? - 26
- School board papers: Beaudry gets left behind - 1
- Data overreach Are programs really justified? The weak case for PRISM. - 11
- A Medicaid reduction? That is not likely - 8
- Border security? Maybe, some day, perhaps. Or not - 35
- Priority profs: University system tops HHS - 5
- Recognizing father: Not PC, but still OK - 1
- Closing Hanover St.: Not a 'free market' move - 6
- Step into the past: Discover old NH this weekend - 0
Tax credit math: Who owns your money?
READER COMMENTS: 2- Santos drives in three as Curve beat Fisher Cats in 10 - 0
- Large billboards grabbing attention on Route 101 in Epping - 2
- Pearl Street lot proposal involves student housing in Manchester - 0
- Manchester VFW posts fights to survive without poker cash - 0
- Surveillance led NSA to 50 terror 'events' - 0
- One arrested as Concord gun-control rally gets rowdy - 16
- Celtics, Clippers call off Doc deal - 0
- High school football is in the air as CHad practice opens - 0
- Agencies to offer summer food service to Derry children in need - 0
LeBron, Heat edge Spurs in OT, force Game 7
READER COMMENTS: 0
Sorry, no question available



