New Hampshire Union Leader
Wed, May. 23

Welcome guest, you have 3 views left. | Register | Sign In
News | Sports | Business | A&E | Opinion

Home » News » Business

Lack of long-term highway bill hurts I-93 widening plan



SALEM — Sen. Jeanne Shaheen spoke with local authorities and business people about the importance of passing a funding extension that will keep the Interstate 93 widening project moving forward.

Representatives from Salem, Windham, Derry, Londonderry, the New Hampshire Department of Transportation and businesses affected by the I-93 project met with Shaheen at Salem Town Hall on Tuesday afternoon.

“This is a project that not only has been worked on for a long time but is critical to what is going on in southern New Hampshire,” Shaheen said.

The project was budgeted and planned based on the idea that the federal government would provide a consistent amount of funding, Shaheen said. Uncertainty created by a lack of long-term highway bill had made the project difficult to finance, Shaheen said.

“It's really hard to plan without any sense of certainty about what's coming out of the highway bill,” said Cliff Sinnott, executive director of the Rockingham Planning Commission.

He estimated that 18 projects had been removed, delayed or reconfigured due to financing. Borrowing costs are low and bids are competitive, making this a good time to move the projects forward, Sinnott said.

“It's unfortunate that we can't capture that type of opportunity,” Sinnott said.

About $115 million in bonding authority now on hold is meant for contracts to complete the bulk of work around Exit 2 and the final configuration of Exit 3.

“It affects our entire commercial area, and it's a waiting game now,” said Laura Scott, community development director for the town of Windham.

The highway project includes reconfiguration of some roads in Windham, causing business owners to hold off their own expansions until the state work is complete, Scott said.

“Businesses understand when there's a financial constraint but it's at the point now where there's no answer left,” Scott said.

In addition to the $115 million in bonding authority being held, about $365 million worth of projects were left unfunded and another $250 million in funding is needed, according to Mark Sanborn, federal liaison to the state transportation department. The I-93 project is a priority that the state remains committed to, Sanborn said.

“Federal aid is a huge portion of the pie. Until we have more secure funding our hands are tied in terms of moving forward on a number of projects,” Sanborn said.

The officials asked Shaheen if anything could be done about regulations and formulas that make it difficult for small towns to compete for federal dollars to use on critical infrastructure projects.

Shaheen said she was looking for bipartisan solutions to the state's infrastructure problems. She urged them to contact members of the Legislature with their concerns.

“We need to move those funds off the sidelines and get this project going,” Shaheen said.




Comments


To improve the chance of seeing your comment posted here or published in the New Hampshire Union Leader:

Note: Comments are the opinion of the respective poster and not of the publisher.

Michael Bertoulin said:

The Federal and State governments need to get their acts together. During the Interstate contraction heydays the gas taxes federal and state provided sufficient funding for the highway trust funds and now they don't. The problem is simple to define gas taxes have not kept pace with inflation and gas mileage has dramatically improved over the past 30 years, so gas tax revenues are less than 1/2 of what they previously were.If you want good roads you have to pay for them like in the old days. The federal and state gas taxes have been unchanged in 20 years, the problem here is not government its people who don't feel like they have to pay for anything. Well everyone that benefits needs to pay through user fee/taxes, not just the 51%, or the 5% or the 1%.
(Report Abuse)

February 22, 2012 8:19 am

Gary Kerr said:

This situation is another example, in a long line of examples, where NH's politicians continue their failure to do any prior planning and their continued failure to establish a primary list of essential core services. Had they completed their responsibilities, rather than to continuously bickering among themselves, in a timely manner, then adequate funding sources would have been established and truly "saved up" for the need to supply, construct, and maintain a viable transportation infrastructure. Because of all politicians' failures, we residents and businesses are to pay the price for their failures, as well as, their poor choices of their political appointee friends as heads of all state level departments.
(Report Abuse)

February 22, 2012 10:30 am

Post a comment


You must sign in before you can post comments. If you are experiencing issues with your account please e-mail abuse@unionleader.com.



View Full Site | Subscribe | Deal of the Day | Contact Us

© Union Leader Corp.